Which of the following is NOT among the criticisms of Kierkegaard presented in the first half of the reading?

A. If truth merely depends on strength of conviction, then ANYTHING can be true.
B. It's not possible to justify a leap of faith towards Christianity in preference to a leap of faith towards any other religion.
C. It's self-contradictory for Kierkegaard to try to rationally explain why we should embrace an irrational belief.
D. Kierkegaard's beliefs conflict with the standard Christian view that religious claims are objectively true.