Which court case do you think has made the most profound impact regarding the exclusionary rule? Discuss the importance of the case, its bearing on the exclusionary rule, and how the Court's decision has impacted cases that have come after the ruling. Be sure to include in your discussion whether or not the exclusionary rule is still necessary in 2023.
A) Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The case established the exclusionary rule at the state level, ensuring evidence obtained unlawfully cannot be used in court. The decision has set a precedent for protecting constitutional rights and is still necessary today.
B) Miranda v. Arizona (1966): This case established the Miranda rights, ensuring individuals are informed of their rights upon arrest. It influenced the exclusionary rule by emphasizing the protection of constitutional rights.
C) Terry v. Ohio (1968): The case established the legality of stop-and-frisk procedures. While not directly related to the exclusionary rule, it influenced the interpretation of police powers.
D) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): This case established the right to counsel for criminal defendants. Although significant, it did not directly impact the exclusionary rule.