Defendant was carrying on a blasting operation. Nearby plaintiff raised minks for fur. The plaintiff's female minks killed their young as a result of being frightened by the defendant's blasting operation. The plaintiff sues defendant, claiming strict liability. The court will likely
a. allow the claim because blasting is an abnormally dangerous activity.
b. reject the claim because blasting is not an abnormally dangerous activity
c. reject the claim because the harm was unrelated to the activity being abnormally dangerous
d. reject the claim because plaintiff was raising wild animals.