There are numerous errors in the citations in the following passage. Correct citations using your edition of The Bluebook. You may need to supply missing information. To survive a motion to dismiss, a Plaintiff must allege "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Bell Atlantic Corp. Inc. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007). A claim is facially plausible when the plaintiff pleads facts that allow the court to draw "the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable...for the misconduct alleged". John Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US 662, 678 (2009) (emphasis in original). There must be more than a "sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully." Id. 680. While courts do not require heightened fact pleading of specifics, a Plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to raise a right to relief above the speculative level. Bell Atlantic, supra, at 550. In deciding whether the plaintiff has stated a claim upon which relief can be granted, this court must accept the plaintiff's allegations as true and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff. See Usher v. City of Los Angeles, California, 828 F.2nd 556, 581 (9th Cir. 1987).