A real-estate agent conducted an experiment to test the effect selling a staged home vs. selling an empty home. To do so, the agent obtained a list of 10 comparable homes just listed for sale that were currently empty. He randomly assigned 5 of the homes to be "staged," meaning filled with nice furniture and decorated. the owners of the 5 homes all agreed to have their homes staged by professional decorators. The other 5 homes remained empty. the hypothesis is that empty homes are not as appealing to buyers as staged homes and, therefore, sell for lower prices than staged homes. the mean selling price of the 5 empty homes was $150,000 with a standard deviation of $22,000. The mean selling price of the 5 staged homes was $175,000 with a standard deviation of 35,000. A dotplot of each sample shows no strong skewness and no outliers. The agent tests h0: μ1 – μ2 = 0, ha: μ1 – μ2 < 0, where μ1 = the true mean selling price of all comparable empty homes and μ2 = the true mean selling price of all comparable staged homes. The conditions for inference are met. The standardized test statistic is t = –1.35, and the p-value is between 0.10 and 0.15. What conclusion should be made using the significance level, alpha = 0.10?

A) Reject H0. There is convincing evidence that the true mean selling price of all comparable empty homes is less than the true mean selling price of all comparable staged homes.
B) Reject H0. There is not convincing evidence that the true mean selling price of all comparable empty homes is less than the true mean selling price of all comparable staged homes.
C) Fail to reject H0. There is convincing evidence that the true mean selling price of all comparable empty homes is less than the true mean selling price of all comparable staged homes.
D) Fail to reject H0. There is not convincing evidence that the true mean selling price of all comparable empty homes is less than the true mean selling price of all comparable staged homes.