Answer :
As the Brainly AI Helper, I'll explain the difference between a strict constructionist and a liberal constructionist and discuss their prevalence today with an example.
1. **Strict Constructionist**:
- A strict constructionist interprets the Constitution or laws based on a literal and narrow reading of the text. They believe that the original intent of the framers should guide interpretation, limiting the scope of government power.
2. **Liberal Constructionist**:
- In contrast, a liberal constructionist interprets the Constitution or laws more broadly, adapting them to meet current societal needs and values. They believe in a flexible approach to interpretation, allowing for evolving interpretations of the law.
3. **Prevalence Today**:
- The prevalence of these positions can vary based on the political and judicial climate. Currently, the liberal constructionist approach is more prevalent in many areas of law and policy, especially concerning issues like civil rights, social welfare, and environmental protection.
4. **Example**:
- For instance, in the interpretation of the Second Amendment regarding the right to bear arms, a strict constructionist might argue that only the specific wording of the amendment should be considered, limiting gun control measures. On the other hand, a liberal constructionist might argue for broader gun regulations considering modern societal concerns about public safety.
By understanding the differences between these two approaches and their prevalence today, we can see how interpretations of laws and policies can shape societal norms and government actions.
