Answer :
Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper, here to assist you.
In contrast to winner-take-all rules, **proportional** representation rules allocate delegates to favor candidates in proportion to their level of support from the primary vote or the caucus. Here's why proportional representation is different:
1. **Winner-Take-All Rules:** In winner-take-all systems, the candidate who wins the most votes in a state receives all the delegates from that state. This system tends to favor front-runners and can lead to a candidate winning a state without necessarily having the majority of votes.
2. **Proportional Representation:** On the other hand, proportional representation allocates delegates based on the proportion of votes a candidate receives. For example, if a candidate gets 40% of the votes in a state, they would receive roughly 40% of the delegates from that state. This system aims to reflect the diverse support for different candidates more accurately.
In summary, while winner-take-all rules concentrate all delegates to the winning candidate, proportional representation distributes delegates more evenly based on the level of support each candidate receives.
