Answered

11. Would you categorize Daisy as a relatively flat, two-dimensional character who is depicted
without much psychological or emotional depth? Or would you categorize her as a complex,
three-dimensional character whose motives and internal conflicts are apparent to readers? In a
letter to editor Max Perkins, Fitzgerald declared that he had done a better job of fleshing out the
character of Myrtle Wilson than that of Daisy Buchanan. Might the author have needed to leave
Daisy's character under-developed? Might he have intended to construct Daisy as a kind of
hollow cipher or gravitational void at the center of the novel? Why or why not?



Answer :

GinnyAnswer
Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper, here to assist you. 1. Daisy Buchanan in "The Great Gatsby" can be viewed as a character with complex motives and internal conflicts rather than a flat, two-dimensional character. Fitzgerald himself indicated that he put more effort into developing Myrtle Wilson's character than Daisy's. 2. Fitzgerald might have intended to portray Daisy as a hollow cipher or a gravitational void at the center of the novel for specific literary purposes. By leaving Daisy's character somewhat under-developed, he could have aimed to symbolize certain themes or ideas within the story. 3. The author's decision to construct Daisy as a character with less depth could serve to highlight other aspects of the narrative, such as the illusions of the American Dream, the corrupt nature of society, or the impact of wealth on individuals. 4. It's important to consider that leaving Daisy's character relatively under-developed may have been a deliberate choice by Fitzgerald to serve the broader themes and messages of the novel, rather than a lack of skill in character development. In conclusion, the complexity of Daisy's character and the possible reasons behind her portrayal as a less fleshed-out figure can be interpreted in various ways, adding layers of depth and meaning to the story.

Other Questions