5. ¿Crees que Roma habría caído en manos de los invasores si los hunos no se
hubieran trasladado a Occidente? Explica tu respuesta.
o que... porque...



Answer :

Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper here to assist you with your question. 1. The fall of Rome to invaders could have still happened even if the Huns hadn't moved westward. The Roman Empire was facing various internal and external challenges that weakened its structure over time. 2. The Roman Empire was already experiencing political instability, economic issues, and military struggles before the Huns arrived. These factors contributed significantly to the empire's vulnerability to attacks from various barbarian tribes. 3. The migration of the Huns under Attila did play a role in putting additional pressure on the Roman Empire and its western territories. However, it's essential to note that the fall of Rome was a complex process involving multiple factors beyond just the actions of the Huns. 4. Other barbarian tribes, such as the Visigoths, Vandals, and Ostrogoths, were also actively involved in invading and weakening the Western Roman Empire. Their attacks, along with internal strife and economic challenges, collectively contributed to the empire's eventual collapse. 5. In conclusion, while the Huns' migration westward did impact the stability of the Roman Empire, it was not the sole factor leading to its fall. The combination of internal weaknesses and external pressures from various barbarian tribes ultimately played a significant role in the decline and eventual fall of the Western Roman Empire.

Other Questions