Answered

Why should we care? What difference does it make if some species are extinguished, if even half of all the
species on
earth disappear? Let me count the ways. New sources of scientific information will be lost. Vast
potential biological wealth will be destroyed. Still undeveloped medicines, crops, pharmaceuticals, timber, fibers,
pulp, soil-restoring vegetation, petroleum substitutes, and other products and amenities will never come to light.
It is fashionable in some quarters to wave aside the small and obscure, the bugs and weeds, forgetting that an
obscure
moth from Latin America saved Australia's pastureland from overgrowth by cactus, that the rosy
periwinkle provided the cure for Hodgkin's disease and childhood lymphocytic leukemia, that the bark of the
Pacific yew offers hope for victims of ovarian and breast cancer, that a chemical from the saliva of leeches
dissolves blood clots during surgery, and so on down a roster already grown long and illustrious despite the
limited
research addressed to it.
Which techniques does Wilson use in this excerpt to convey important information to his readers?
O Wilson uses humorous anecdotes that make the information more interesting.
Wilson uses metaphors that appeal to a wide range of the reader's senses.
Wilson relates the significance of the information directly to the reader's life.
O Wilson refers to empirical statistics to relate the importance of his message.



Answer :

CypressSage

Answer:

Wilson relates the significance of the information directly to the reader's life.

Explanation:

In this excerpt, Wilson is using a combination of techniques to convey important information to his readers. Let's take a look at each option:

  1. Wilson does not use humorous anecdotes in this particular excerpt. He mainly focuses on providing examples and facts to highlight the importance of species preservation.
  2. Wilson does not use metaphors in this excerpt either. He presents the information in a straightforward manner without relying on figurative language.
  3. Wilson does relate the significance of the information directly to the reader's life. He mentions the potential loss of medicines, crops, and other products that could have beneficial impacts on human health and well-being. By making this connection, he emphasizes the relevance of biodiversity to our own lives.
  4. Wilson does not specifically refer to empirical statistics in this excerpt. Instead, he uses specific examples of how certain species have already contributed to scientific discoveries and potential future benefits.

Therefore, the correct answer would be option 3. Wilson directly relates the significance of the information to the reader's life, highlighting the potential benefits that could be lost if species extinction continues.

Hope this helps!

Other Questions