Why did fewer towns develop in the southern colonies compared to the New England colonies?
â—‹ A.
O B.
â—‹ C.
The roads were in poor condition, so waterways were the prime source of transportation.
Each community of planters had its own church and school and provided for all of the community's needs.
The colonists made huge profits from the trade in cash crops and had no incentive to develop towns.
The plantations were huge and far apart, so the population was scattered.
O E.
Much of the land along the Chesapeake Bay was not suited for settlement.
â—‹ D.



Answer :

Final answer:

Towns developed less in the Southern colonies than in the New England colonies due to factors such as scattered plantations, an agricultural-focused economy, and limited transportation and industrial development.


Explanation:

The fewer towns in the southern colonies compared to the New England colonies can be attributed to several factors:

  1. The plantations in the Southern colonies were vast and far apart, leading to a scattered population.
  2. The economy in the Southern colonies heavily relied on cash crops like tobacco and cotton, discouraging the development of towns as the focus was on agriculture.
  3. The South lagged in transportation and industrial development compared to the North, with fewer roads, canals, and factories being built.

Learn more about Development of towns in Southern vs. New England colonies here:

https://brainly.com/question/25043432


Other Questions