Answered

Directions: Answer the following questions about delineating arguments after rereading pages
133-134, 147-150, and 153-155
from chapters 10 and 11 of The Omnivore's
Dilemma.
1. In chapter 11 of The Omnivore's Dilemma, Michael Pollan implies the central claim that
industrial organic food is better than industrially raised food, yet it still has negative impacts
on human health and the environment. Select one supporting point for this claim. (
RI.8.8
)
2. What is one piece of relevant evidence that supports this point? (RI.8.8)
3. Read pages 158-159, and select another supporting point for this claim. (RI.8.8)



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In The Omnivore's Dilemma, Pollan discusses the impacts of industrial organic food compared to industrially raised food, highlighting both advantages and drawbacks.


Explanation:

In chapter 11 of The Omnivore's Dilemma, Michael Pollan implies that industrial organic food has its advantages over industrially raised food, yet it still carries negative impacts on human health and the environment. A supporting point for this claim is that industrial organic food often maintains higher standards in terms of animal welfare compared to conventional industrial methods.

One piece of evidence supporting this point can be found in Pollan's discussion of how industrial organic farms tend to prioritize the well-being of animals by providing more space and avoiding certain harmful practices prevalent in conventional industrial farming.

Another supporting point from pages 158-159 is the acknowledgment that while industrial organic food may address some issues present in conventional methods, it still falls short in terms of fully mitigating the negative environmental impacts associated with large-scale agricultural practices.


Learn more about The Omnivore's Dilemma, industrial organic food, supporting arguments here:

https://brainly.com/question/33706911


Other Questions