Answer :
Final answer:
The given argument does not follow the Law of Syllogism.
Explanation:
No, the given argument does not illustrate the Law of Syllogism but rather follows the Law of Detachment or Modus Ponens. The Law of Syllogism involves two conditional statements leading to a conclusion, while this argument involves a conditional statement leading to a consequent statement.
Learn more about Law of Syllogism here:
https://brainly.com/question/38578914