¿Qué diferencias y similitudes encuentran entre jugar un partido (o participar de un juego) y simplemente mirarlo (en la cancha o en la tele)?

- ¿Sienten las mismas experiencias?
- ¿Consideran que la participación directa compromete más con el juego, con los otros? ¿Por qué?



Answer :

Final answer:

Playing a game involves active engagement and influence on the outcome, while spectating is a more passive experience. Direct participation fosters deeper connections and commitment to the game and others. The emphasis on winning in games can reflect societal values and impact personal development.


Explanation:

Participating in a game versus simply watching it involves different levels of engagement. When playing, individuals experience the game firsthand, actively contributing to the outcome through their actions. On the other hand, observing a game as a spectator offers a more passive experience where one enjoys the game without directly affecting its outcome.

Direct participation in a game tends to create a deeper sense of commitment and connection to the game and to others involved. The act of playing fosters a greater sense of involvement and investment in the game's progress and outcome, strengthening bonds with fellow players.

Moreover, the emphasis on winning in games can reflect societal values and norms, influencing individuals' mindsets and behaviors. Understanding these dynamics can lead to questions about the role of competition in society and personal development.


Learn more about Engagement in games here:

https://brainly.com/question/8081362


Other Questions