Answered

How does synthesis differ from argumentation?

A. Synthesis involves presenting one-sided viewpoints, while argumentation involves presenting a balanced perspective with equal attention to opposing viewpoints.
B. Synthesis involves combining multiple sources to create a new perspective, while argumentation involves supporting a specific perspective with evidence.
C. Synthesis involves presenting a counterargument, while argumentation involves ignoring opposing viewpoints.
D. Synthesis involves summarizing sources without analysis, while argumentation involves analyzing sources in-depth.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Synthesis combines multiple sources to form new perspectives, while argumentation supports a specific viewpoint with evidence.


Explanation:

Synthesis involves combining multiple sources to create a new perspective, while argumentation involves supporting a specific perspective with evidence. Synthesis requires drawing from various sources to form a holistic viewpoint, while argumentation focuses on defending a particular stance with supporting data and reasoning. Through synthesis, new ideas are generated by comparing and blending information, whereas argumentation centers on presenting and reinforcing a specific viewpoint.


Learn more about Difference between synthesis and argumentation here:

https://brainly.com/question/39714133


Other Questions