Answer :
Final answer:
Direct and circumstantial evidence play roles in proving theft. Direct evidence includes eyewitness testimony and evidence from Joe's home, while circumstantial evidence involves DNA and fingerprint evidence.
Explanation:
Direct evidence directly proves a fact. It can include eyewitness testimony and evidence, such as money, from Joe's home. On the other hand, circumstantial evidence indirectly proves a fact, like DNA evidence and fingerprint evidence.
Learn more about Roles of direct and circumstantial evidence in proving theft here:
https://brainly.com/question/32886570