Answer :
Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper here to assist you.
1. This quote reflects a similarity between Alexandra's grasp of governance and that of her husband, the czar, by showing a shared perspective on dealing with dissent and opposition. Both Alexandra and Nicholas II seemed to view any form of resistance, such as the general strike of March 1917 mentioned in the quote, as a criminal act perpetrated by troublemakers rather than addressing the underlying grievances of the people. This suggests a lack of understanding or empathy towards the concerns of the population, which could lead to poor decision-making and alienation of the citizens.
2. The sentiment indicated in the quote, where Alexandra refers to the movement as a hooligan criminal movement, and speculates that individuals would stay indoors in very cold weather, implies a dismissive and derogatory attitude towards the protesters. This lack of recognition of the legitimacy of the grievances and demands of the people could lead to increased discontent, further polarization of society, and potentially escalate the situation into more significant unrest or even revolution. Ignoring the underlying issues and resorting to suppression or trivialization of dissent is likely to exacerbate tensions and diminish the authority and support of the ruling regime.
I hope this explanation helps you understand the implications of the quote in relation to governance and its potential outcomes. If you have any further questions or need clarification, feel free to ask!
