James Mill's periodisation oversimplifies Indian history; revisiting British historians' works is important; the Eurocentric approach in periodising Indian history is problematic.
James Mill divided Indian history into Hindu, Muslim, and British periods due to his colonial perspective, emphasizing religious and colonial influences. However, his periodisation is deemed unacceptable because it oversimplifies complex historical processes and neglects the rich diversity and interplay of various cultures in India.
Revisiting British Historians' Works is essential to gain a more nuanced and unbiased understanding of Indian history. New dates may be needed to address biases and present a more comprehensive narrative that includes diverse perspectives and experiences.
The problem with the periodisation of Indian history into ancient, medieval, and modern lies in the Eurocentric approach that disregards indigenous historical contexts and perpetuates a linear narrative that does not accurately represent the complexity of India's history.
https://brainly.com/question/39218840